Skip to main content

tv   International Programming  CSPAN  November 8, 2010 12:00am-12:30am EST

12:00 am
>> does the prime minister agree that raf marham should be retained as a base for the tornado? it makes economic sense, as there is a strong skills base in west norfolk. west norfolk also has higher unemployment and higher deprivation than the area of the alternative base under consideration in scotland. >> my hon. friend makes a good plea for her area, and she is absolutely right to do so. she will know that we are committed to retaining the tornado, which has been a very effective ground-attack we have
12:01 am
not made the final minister in paying tribute to 101 city of london engineer heroic work, and we send our family. we fully support the actions that the government are taking to tackle the terrorist threat that we saw re-emerge last week. will the prime minister update the house on the review of air freight and passenger security, and tell us when he believes that it is likely to be complete? >> i am grateful for the right hon. gentleman's comments. as he knows, several steps have already been taken: stopping freight transport from yemen and somalia, suspending the carriage of toner cartridges in passenger hand luggage on flights departing the uk, and prohibiting the carriage of toner cartridges by air cargo into, via or from the uk unless they originate from a known consigner. as he said, we are reviewing all aspects of air freight security. it is a complicated and difficult issue, there is a meeting with the industry tomorrow, and we will update the house as soon as we can. >> i thank the prime minister
12:02 am
for that answer. may i take the opportunity to ask him about the wider context of the incident? does he agree that, as well as the right measures on counter- terrorism, we need to tackle its roots? he knows that yemen has long been one of the poorest countries in the middle east. that is why the friends of yemen conference was held earlier this year, and one is organized for next february. will he update the house on the progress of the friends of yemen talks, and also the progress on the crucial international monetary fund plan for yemen to deliver much needed economic reform? >> what the right hon. gentleman says is absolutely right. as well as good intelligence sharing and tough anti-terrorism legislation, we must deal with the root causes, and there is now a worrying strain of al- qaeda terrorism coming out of the yemen. one of the problems is that we need to ensure that that is the priority for the yemeni government, who are also dealing with other problems in
12:03 am
their country. the friends of yemen process, which the former prime minister did a great deal to establish, is up and running. it is working well. the british are co-chairs of it with the saudis, there was a meeting at the un general assembly, there will be further meetings, and the whole aim is to try to pressurize and work with the yemeni government to deal with the issues that affect the wider region and, indeed, as recent events show, us too. we will go on with that and we will continue, as we have committed, with our development budget to ensure that development aid goes to the yemen. there is therefore a short-term issue of getting the yemeni government to concentrate on what matters, and a longer-term issue about economic development in the yemen, which badly needs to improve. >> i thank the prime minister for that answer, and thank him and the home secretary for
12:04 am
keeping the house updated on those issues. i know that they will continue to do so. let me turn elsewhere. the prime minister has talked a lot about restoring trust in politics. what does he expect of members of his government who gave cast- iron guarantees to their voters six months ago that they would vote against a rise in tuition fees? >> what i would say to everyone who is part of the government is that i think that they have all taken some courageous and difficult decisions to deal with something that, frankly, we all want. i think that every single person in the house of commons wants strong universities that are well funded and have greater independence. we want to ensure that people from the poorest homes can go to the best universities in our country. the proposals will achieve that. they grew from a decision by the previous government to set up the browne report. what a pity that opportunism has overtaken principle. >> the prime minister used to think that trust mattered. what did he say in his joint foreword with the deputy prime minister to the coalition
12:05 am
agreement? "we both want a britain where our political system is looked at with admiration, not anger". does the prime minister not understand the anger that there will be among the constituents of all the members on the liberal democrat benches? does he not understand the anger that will be felt in sheffield, twickenham, eastleigh-all their constituencies-about promises made and about to be broken? >> along goes the milibandwagon, and on we jump. the right hon. gentleman talks about trust. what did he write in the labor manifesto about the browne report, which he set up? the labor party has completely broken its word. there is a debate now in britain about how we get strong universities and people able to go to them without being put
12:06 am
off. that is what we propose and he opposes. he should listen to the former labor trade and industry secretary, who was part of the browne process. he said: "the truth is there are many tax elements to the browne plan. you only pay when you are earning above £21,000... browne is essentially right". why not join the consensus instead of just playing political games? >> i ask the questions at prime minister's questions. the prime minister talks about hard choices-he claims to be making a hard choice on tuition fees. i cannot believe that he is talking about hard choices this week, because whom has he chosen to put on the civil service payroll this week? his own personal photographer.
12:07 am
there is good news for the prime minister-apparently he does a nice line in airbrushing. you can picture the scene, mr. speaker, of the cabinet photo: "we're all in this together, just a little bit more to the right, nick." let me ask the prime minister in all seriousness, is it really a wise judgment when he is telling everybody to tighten their belts to put his own personal photographer on the civil service payroll? >> the right hon. gentleman asks the questions because he has no answers to anything. is this what his opposition leadership is reduced to? let me give the house this figure. the previous government -- >> answer! >> this is the answer.
12:08 am
>> order. the prime minister will be heard. there is far too much shouting going on, including by some very senior members who ought to know better. >> the last government last year spent half a billion pounds on communications. we are cutting that by two thirds. that is what is actually happening. we will be spending a bit less on replacing mobile phones as well in no. 10 downing street. honestly, why not engage in the issues? we say that we need a new system to fund higher education, and that is what we are backing. the right hon. gentleman says that he wants a graduate tax, the shadow chancellor says, "don't do it," and the shadow trade and industry secretary is against it. what on earth is the leader of
12:09 am
the opposition reduced to? >> the prime minister cannot even defend his own decision. is not the truth that we are learning that this government are a government of broken promises-broken promises on tuition fees, broken promises on vat and broken promises on child benefit from the prime minister? that is what they meant by broken britain. the prime minister used to say that he wanted to restore trust, but all he is doing, day by day, is destroying trust in politics. >> the right hon. gentleman can come here every week and have a succession of lame sound bites or engage in the substance about the future of our country. we know what he is against-he is against a housing benefit cap, against taking child benefit away from millionaires and against a benefit cap-but i think everyone is beginning to ask, "what on earth is he for?" >> i am sure that the prime
12:10 am
minister, and indeed the whole house, will join me in sending condolences to the family and friends of marvin henry, a young man who was shot and killed in my constituency just last week. what practical encouragement can the prime minister give to organizations such as the watling boys club in burnt oak, which is attempting to direct young people towards positive role models and experiences rather than the fate that befell marvin? >> my hon. friend makes an extremely good point. as we are making difficult decisions about public spending, we need to make sure that we go on funding organizations that divert young people away from crime. that is one reason why we have set up a special fund of £100 million this year and next year- to make sure that those organizations that need help get it, so that we keep giving young people things to do and
12:11 am
divert them from crime. >> may i give the prime minister another opportunity to answer the question? does he think that the 500,000 public sector workers facing the axe will be pleased to know that he has hired his own personal vanity photographer? >> the last government-half a billion pounds wasted on communication. that is being axed by this government. that is what is happening. choice when they come here. they can read out the whips' handout or think of a good question. try again. >> can i encourage the prime minister to work with members on both sides of the house who recognize the need for welfare reform, starting with the shadow health secretary, who has broken ranks to support a housing benefit cap? >> my hon. friend makes a very
12:12 am
good point. we do need a debate about how we tackle the welfare system and get it under control. one of the best places to start with housing benefit is the labor manifesto, personally written by the right hon. member for doncaster north. it said clearly -- >> "ooh!" >> well, they all stood on it, so they should be reminded of it. it said: "housing benefit will be reformed to ensure that we do not subsidize people to live in the private sector on rents that other ordinary working families could not afford." the level of opportunism is so great that even when we introduce their policies they oppose them. >> the prime minister will be aware of the horrific explosion that took place in salford this week. our thoughts are with marie burns, the elderly lady who has
12:13 am
been severely injured and is in hospital, and with the other people in hospital. some 200 families have had to be evacuated from their homes and i wish to pay tribute to all of the emergency services and the city council, but most of all to the ordinary men and women of that community who have stepped forward. a grandfather rescued a child from the rubble, and neighbors opened the local pub and the leisure centre to give people comfort and shelter. they have done a fabulous job. the costs of this event will be enormous and, like every other service, our council is facing significant reductions in its budget. will the prime minister seriously consider what extra help he can give to those families to ensure that they are supported? my hon. friend the member for worsley and eccles south my hon. friend, in whose constituency this took place, is with the community now- >> we get the essence of it. >> i think that the house is being unfair to the right hon. lady. she is speaking powerfully on behalf of her constituents on an important issue.
12:14 am
it was a dreadful accident, and we should think of all those people who have lost their homes and are in temporary accommodation. she is right to pay tribute not just to the emergency services but to ordinary people who have gone out and done extraordinary things. as i understand it, the city west housing trust, which owns the properties, is working closely with the local authority to ensure that residents are able to return to their homes as soon as possible. the right hon. lady raises the issue of funding, and of course there is the bellwin scheme, but we will ensure that we respond as we can to salford's needs. >> the east anglian coast has some of the highest levels of deprivation in england and an urgent need for infrastructure development, but it has huge potential for creating jobs in the offshore renewables sector. will the prime minister look again at the exclusion of the east anglian coast from the £60
12:15 am
million allocated to establish offshore wind manufacturing at port sites, announced under the grant for business investment scheme last week? >> there is a great opportunity for communities, especially coastal communities, to make the most of offshore wind, and i have spoken to several leading industrialists, who are thinking of investing in britain, to ensure that the grants are there. as my hon. friend will know, this grant scheme applies only to assisted areas. east anglia is not an assisted area, but that does not rule out development taking place, and other sources of funding, such as the regional growth fund, can be applied to. i hope that he will look into those as he stands up for his community. >> following the statement last week by the secretary of state for transport, will the prime minister give a commitment to the people of leeds that the much needed new generation transport system, the
12:16 am
trolleybus, will receive the government funding that it has been promised for so long? >> this issue is currently under consideration, and i am sure that the hon. gentleman will be one of the first to find out the result. >> in the year to march, more than 1,000 foreign nationals in northamptonshire applied for indefinite leave to remain in the united kingdom, and a massive 80% of those applications were approved. will my right hon. friend reassure my constituents that, in this government's legitimate efforts to reduce the backlog of asylum claims left by the previous government, people will not simply be waved through and offered indefinite stays? >> my hon. friend makes a very good point. there is always a danger when there is a big backlog-we have been left one of 400,000 to 450,000 of asylum records-to just wave them through, but i assure him that there will be no amnesty.
12:17 am
all cases will be considered on their individual merits. we are committed to getting immigration and asylum issues under control. we are looking at the last government's points system, and even under their tier 1 of highly skilled people, it turns out that around 30% of those given leave to remain are in low-skilled roles. the current system is not working, and we are going to sort it out. >> i would like to return to the education maintenance allowance. in march, the prime minister came to lewisham college and spoke to students about his plans. he said: "we'll keep it. we've taken a look at it. we think it's a good idea." will he explain to me and the 1,150 students at the college who are currently receiving ema why his government are scrapping it? >> because we face the biggest budget deficit of any country in the developed world. that, frankly, is the prism through which such decisions must be seen. in politics there is a choice:
12:18 am
either confront the problems in front of you and deal with them-that is what this government are doing-or run away from them, like the labor party. we are putting in place something that will be more targeted and more effective, but we must deal with the mess that we were left. >> what recent representations he has received on the likely effects on small businesses of the implementation of the government's proposals for automatic enrolment in pension schemes. >> i thank my hon. friend for the question. the making automatic enrolment work review, which was published last week, examined the impact on businesses of the reforms. it concluded that small businesses did need to be included in the reforms if we are to bring about the improvement in savings for retirement necessary to tackle the consequences of an ageing population and widespread under-saving for retirement. these reforms will give 1.2 million people who work for small businesses the
12:19 am
opportunity to save for their retirement. the review made a number of recommendations to try to help small businesses to introduce those reforms. we shall look at them extremely carefully to ensure that they are not too onerous. >> i welcome the government's desire to encourage a savings culture. however, for many small businesses, every new piece of legislation, no matter how small, has a significant impact on the bottom line. will the prime minister introduce a scheme that allows us to road-test all new legislation and its impact on small businesses? >> my hon. friend makes an extremely good point, and this policy will be road-tested on the bigger companies that must introduce it first. however, we must accept that there is a problem with only 10% of very small businesses having pension provision, so 1.2 million people will have the chance to save. we will look very carefully at the reforms, and they will not be introduced for small businesses until at least 2014. my hon. friend will know that i have appointed lord young to look at
12:20 am
all the impacts on small businesses. we also have the one-in, one- out rule under which every new regulation must mean that another regulation is scrapped. >> will the prime minister tell the house the total overall saving from reducing the overall number of elected mps by 50, and increasing the number of unelected lords by up to 100? >> let us start with the first thing: reducing the size of the house of commons. >> costs. >> size and costs. i remind the hon. gentleman that his vale of clwyd constituency has just 55,968 people -- i am sorry, but my constituency has many more than that. i am afraid that i must just ask him to work a little harder. >> earlier this year, the prime minister visited westhill in my constituency. it is a world centre of excellence in sub-sea engineering. will he ensure that the home office meets concerned local
12:21 am
companies to discuss the future of the visa system to ensure that vital inward investment is not lost to this country? it supports thousands of local jobs. >> we will certainly do that. as i said in answer to an earlier question, as we look through the last government's points system and immigration policy, we really do believe that it will not be difficult to achieve much better immigration control without disadvantaging business. for example, things such as inter-company transfers should not be included in what we are looking at. i do not think we will have a problem. given the very broken system that we inherited, there should be no problems improving it. >> in almost every answer at pmqs, the prime minister unfairly blames the challenges facing our country on the previous government. will he tell us about his biggest mistake as prime minister? >> i will leave others to judge
12:22 am
the many mistakes that i am sure i will make in this office. i am sure that, as a talented former head teacher, the hon. gentleman would always say to his pupils, "you have to accept your responsibilities", and it is about time that that lot accepted theirs. >> given what the former chief of the defense staff said at the weekend, will the prime minister undertake never to veto essential defense measures because they are politically too difficult? >> my hon. friend makes a very good point. let me first pay tribute to the outgoing chief of the defense staff, sir jock stirrup. he was a dedicated public servant who has done an extremely good job for our country. he made an important point: it is important not that politicians agree with the chiefs of staff on every
12:23 am
occasion-there should be a lively debate between them-but that we should not, as politicians, put off essential decisions that need to be taken. in our defense review i think we have taken the tough and difficult decisions that were necessary. >> it has recently been announced that there will be 300 job losses at new cross hospital in wolverhampton. can the prime minister explain exactly how that squares with his promise to protect the nhs, or is this just another broken promise? >> the promise that we made is a promise that has been delivered, which is to make sure that nhs spending, when we combine capital and current spending, is going to increase in real terms every year. that is not a promise that has been backed by the opposition, so if the hon. lady is worried about nhs cuts, she should start talking to the shadow health secretary. >> talking of photographs, we know from the conservative party conference that the prime minister, like me, enjoys a pint. as he knows, this is the first ever british pub week. will he join me in celebrating
12:24 am
this vital cultural and social institution? will he commit to being a pro- pub government, and will he join the save the pub group- >> order. i have been very helpful to the hon. gentleman, and he should not abuse my help by trying to ask three questions when one will suffice. >> i very much agree with what my hon. friend says. i am a big supporter of british pubs, and i want us to be a pub-friendly government. and yes, i am going to a pub this week. i cannot say where it is, because otherwise it would be discontinued, but i am looking forward to it. >> it is estimated that 1.4 million people are going to lose their jobs, and it is also being said that when vat rises in january, another 300,000 will be lost. why is the prime minister picking on hard-working families? why does he not take it out on the banks and the speculators who caused the problem in the first place? >> this government, unlike
12:25 am
their predecessors, have introduced a banking levy, so the banks will be making a contribution. the hon. gentleman cites the report that was published this week, but it has not been received with much enthusiasm by other organizations. for instance, the institute of directors said that it is "dangerous for the cipd to make headline-grabbing forecasts which are based on little more than a guess". hon. members should spend less time talking down the economy and more time working out how we can get growth. >> does the prime minister agree that it would be wrong for convicted prisoners to be able to vote, as suggested by the european court of human rights? the incarceration of convicted prisoners should mean a loss of rights for that individual, and
12:26 am
that must surely include the right to vote. >> i completely agree with my hon. friend. it makes me physically ill even to contemplate having to give the vote to anyone who is in prison. frankly, when people commit a crime and go to prison, they should lose their rights, including the right to vote. but we are in a situation that i am afraid we have to deal with. this is potentially costing us £160 million, so we have to come forward with proposals, because i do not want us to spend that money, it is not right. so, painful as it is, we have to sort out yet another problem that was just left to us by the last government. >> following the previous question, how does the prime minister view the prospect of prisoners electing the new police and crime commissioners? >> the hon. gentleman raises yet another reason -- >> order. i am particularly anxious to hear the prime minister's answer. >> the hon. gentleman makes an excellent point about why this proposal is so bad, but i am afraid that we have to deal with the
12:27 am
situation in front of us. are we going to delay and delay and waste another £160 million of taxpayers' money, or are we going to take difficult action and explain it to the british public as best we can? i do not think that we have a choice if we are to do the right thing and save the exchequer money. >> is the prime minister aware that the split-site buildings of the duchess's high school in alnwick are in a far worse state than many of the schools included in labor's building schools for the future program, but the school was always excluded from that program? will he make sure that it gets fair consideration under a much more focused and better managed scheme of school buildings? >> i can give that assurance- that we are going to have a new scheme and there will be £15 billion of schools capital spending in the program going forward. that will enable us to rebuild many schools-primary as well as
12:28 am
secondary schools. i look forward to doing that. >> in answer to a question i put to the prime minister in july-and, indeed, in an answer to my hon. friend the member for liverpool, wavertree last week-the prime minister said that the reason for not initiating tax breaks for the computer games industry was that they were poorly targeted. that seems to contradict talks i have had with his ministers, who say that it is government policy not to give tax breaks to any industry in future. will the prime minister give me a definitive answer for the benefit of the house and my constituents? >> the steps we took in the budget, which i think were right, were to look at the tax system and try to simplify the corporation tax regime so that we could bring about one of the lowest rates of corporation tax in the developed world. that is what we have done-with cuts in corporation tax this
12:29 am
year, next year and the year after to bring it down to 24%. that is what we are doing and we are paying for it by removing a number of allowances. i think it is a very progressive and sensible reform that will make britain, including scotland, one of the best places in the world to do business. >> each week that the house of commons is in session, we air prime minister's questions. you can see video archives at c- span.org and links to the house of commons and the prime minister's website. >> up next, a look at how the newly elected congress will work with president obama. also a discussion on voting patterns and a look at how midterm results will affect president obama's c. agenda. --

112 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on